Fadogia agrestis
Herbal stem extract
Also known as fadogia, Vangueria agrestis, black aphrodisiac
A Nigerian shrub sold to men on the strength of a 2005 rat study. There is no human trial of any kind. The same rat lab found testicular changes at every dose after 28 days and membrane damage in liver and kidney. It is here so nobody has to find that out after buying it.
What doses have been studied? What each trial gave, with the population it was given to.
This entry is preclinical
Overview
In shortFadogia is a West African shrub that became a supplement after a 2005 rat study found more mating behavior and higher testosterone. It is promoted to men as a natural testosterone booster. There is no human study of any kind, and the same rat lab later found testicular changes and liver and kidney membrane damage at every dose it tested.
Fadogia agrestis is a shrub of the West African savanna whose stem is used in Nigerian traditional medicine as an aphrodisiac and for fever. It became a supplement after a 2005 study in rats reported more mounting, longer ejaculatory latency and higher testosterone, and it has since been promoted on podcasts as a natural testosterone booster, often stacked with tongkat ali.
Everything known about it in a living body comes from one Nigerian laboratory's rat work, and that work is not all good news. The same group that reported the aphrodisiac effect went on to report testicular changes at every dose tested and signs of cell-membrane damage in liver and kidney. No human study exists: not a trial, not a case series, not a pharmacokinetic study.
Mechanism
In shortThe plant contains alkaloids and saponins. The claimed mechanism is a testosterone rise, inferred from rat blood. A 2023 rat study found it restored the nitric oxide signaling behind erections, which is how sildenafil works. Nothing has been shown to happen in a human.
Phytochemical screening found alkaloids and saponins, with anthraquinones and flavonoids weakly present. The proposed mechanism is a rise in testosterone, inferred from the rat serum levels. A 2023 rat study reported the extract restored nitric oxide and cGMP signaling and antioxidant enzymes in penile and testicular tissue of rats given paroxetine to blunt sexual function. No constituent has been shown to do anything in a human.
Evidence
In shortFive days of extract raised testosterone and mating behavior in rats. The follow-up study gave the same doses for 28 days and found testicular changes at every dose, with recovery only at the lowest, plus enzyme leakage from liver and kidney. Of 17 supplements tested in 2019, five contained none of the plant's marker compounds.
The study it is sold on. Male rats dosed orally at 18, 50 or 100 mg per kg for five days showed increased mount and intromission frequency, longer ejaculatory latency, shorter mount and intromission latency, and a dose-related rise in serum testosterone.
The follow-up the sellers do not quote. The same group gave rats the same doses daily for 28 days. At every dose, testis-to-body weight ratio rose and testicular cholesterol, sialic acid, glycogen and several enzymes shifted, while testicular protein fell. The authors describe these as indications of adverse effects on testicular function, with recovery seen mainly at the lowest dose after a 10-day washout.
Liver and kidney. In the same 28-day design, enzymes leaked from liver and kidney into serum and serum malondialdehyde rose at every dose, which the authors read as peroxidation of cell membranes in hepatocytes and nephrons. No deaths, no organ swelling, no clinical signs.
Rat erectile model. In 2023 the extract at the same three doses restored nitric oxide pathway markers in paroxetine-treated rats, comparably to sildenafil, and the authors recommended clinical trials. None has been run.
What is in the bottle. A 2019 analytical study developed a method to quantify eleven phenolic compounds and tested 17 dietary supplements claiming to contain fadogia: twelve contained the compounds at 0.3 to 2.7 mg per day, and five contained none detectable.
Safety
In shortNo human data at all. The animal data show testicular changes and liver and kidney cell-membrane damage at every dose after 28 days, with recovery only at 18 mg per kg. A testosterone rise alongside testicular damage looks more like irritation than a tonic. Nobody knows what a daily human dose does.
No human safety data of any kind. The animal file shows testicular changes at every dose after 28 days, cell-membrane damage in liver and kidney at every dose, and recovery only at the lowest dose, 18 mg per kg, which the authors note is the folk-medicine dose. The supplement doses sold online are not derived from that figure by any published method.
The two findings together, a testosterone rise and testicular toxicity, are consistent with a testicular irritant rather than a tonic. That is a hypothesis, because nothing has been measured in people. The honest position is that nobody knows what a daily human dose does, and the only organ-level data that exist point the wrong way.
Regulatory status
In shortLegal to sell as a supplement in the US without evidence; no lawful food status in the EU; not a medicine anywhere. Five of 17 products tested contained none of the plant.
Sold as a dietary supplement in the United States without any review, which is legal because the law does not require evidence for a botanical ingredient on the market. Not an authorized novel food in the European Union, so it has no lawful food status there. Not a licensed medicine anywhere. Five of 17 products tested in 2019 contained none of the plant's marker compounds.
The literature
5 studies indexed. Findings and limitations get equal weight, on purpose.
Members area
The Fadogia agrestis literature needs an account
Everything above is free to read. What an account opens is the evidence underneath it: 5 studies with their limitations, and the regimen each trial actually reported.
- Every study, with what it found and what it cannot show
- The limitations, given the same weight as the findings
- The dose each named trial administered, where recorded
Free to create. A membership is separate, and you can decide about that later.
Reading is free, an account is not the same as paying. 80 compound guides, every study with its limitations written underneath, and the regimens those trials actually used. A free account opens all of it. A membership is a separate decision, and it opens the forum. What membership costs.
The wider literature
14 indexed papers and 0 registered trials mentioning Fadogia agrestis, straight from PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. These have not been read by us. Unlike the studies above, they carry no findings and no limitations written by anyone here, because writing either would mean claiming a reading nobody has done. They are a starting point for yours.
Papers (14)
- Elemental analysis of Fadogia ancylantha leaves used as a nutraceutical in Mashonaland West Province, Zimbabwe.
Muzenda T, et al.Open life sciences2023PMID 37791061
journal article
- Fadogia agrestis (Schweinf. Ex Hiern) Stem Extract Restores Selected Biomolecules of Erectile Dysfunction in the Testicular and Penile Tissues of Paroxetine-Treated Wistar Rats.
Ogunro OB, et al.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2023PMID 35969364
journal article
- Three undescribed monoterpene rhamnosides from the aerial parts of Vangueria agrestis.
Osman AG, et al.Natural product research2021PMID 32093520
journal article
- Prevalence of Traditional Medicine Use during Pregnancy, at Labour and for Postpartum Care in a Rural Area in Zimbabwe.
Mawoza T, et al.Clinics in mother and child health2019PMID 31341518
journal article
- Quantification of Phenolic Compounds from Fadogia agrestis and Dietary Supplements using UHPLC-PDA-MS.
Avula B, et al.Planta medica2019PMID 30170324
journal article
- Production of toxic pavettamine and pavettamine conjugates in the gousiekte-causing Fadogia homblei plant and its relation to the bacterial endosymbiont.
Van Elst D, et al.Phytochemistry2013PMID 23009874
journal articleresearch support, non-u.s. gov't
- Antidiabetic, anti-oxidant and antimicrobial activities of Fadogia ancylantha extracts from Malawi.
Nyirenda KK, et al.Journal of ethnopharmacology2012PMID 22800680
journal articleresearch support, non-u.s. gov't
- Ghana's herbal market.
van Andel T, et al.Journal of ethnopharmacology2012PMID 22306470
journal articleresearch support, non-u.s. gov't
- Triterpenoid acids and lactones from the leaves of Fadogia tetraquetra var. tetraquetra (Rubiaceae).
Mulholland DA, et al.Natural product communications2011PMID 22224262
journal article
- Endophytic bacteria in toxic South African plants: identification, phylogeny and possible involvement in gousiekte.
Verstraete B, et al.PloS one2011PMID 21541284
journal articleresearch support, non-u.s. gov't
- Saponins and polyphenols from Fadogia ancylantha (makoni tea).
Mencherini T, et al.Journal of natural products2010PMID 20058934
journal articleresearch support, non-u.s. gov't
- Effects of oral administration of aqueous extract of Fadogia agrestis (Schweinf. Ex Hiern) stem on some testicular function indices of male rats.
Yakubu MT, et al.Journal of ethnopharmacology2008PMID 18023305
journal article
- Aphrodisiac potentials of the aqueous extract of Fadogia agrestis (Schweinf. Ex Hiern) stem in male albino rats.
Yakubu MT, et al.Asian journal of andrology2005PMID 16281088
journal article
- A study of the pathology and pathogenesis of the myocardial lesions in gousiekte, a plant-induced cardiotoxicosis of ruminants.
Prozesky L, et al.The Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research2005PMID 16300190
journal article
Discussion
Fadogia agrestis has its own forum, and sits in Testosterone & Hormones. Every post says what kind of claim it makes.
Nobody has posted about Fadogia agrestis yet.
Membership
Supplements are free. The argument is for members.
The guide above is open to everyone, and the literature underneath it opens with a free account. That is the educational half of this site. Reading and joining the discussion around Fadogia agrestis, and every other entry, is what membership pays for.
For Research & Educational Discussion Only. Not Medical Advice
This guide is educational reference material compiled from published literature. It is not medical advice, not a recommendation, and not a substitute for a clinician who knows your history. Nothing here should be used to make a decision about your own health without one.
Talk to a licensed healthcare professional.