DSIP has been in the literature since 1977. Still nobody has run the trial
The oldest record the importer found for DSIP is from 1977. The newest is 2021. That is 44 y…
Members only. Join to read the rest
For Research & Educational Discussion Only. Not Medical Advice
Nonapeptide, putative sleep modulator
Also known as Delta sleep-inducing peptide
Named for an effect that later work struggled to reproduce. A nine-amino-acid peptide with fifty years of inconsistent literature and no established receptor.
WAGGDASGEThis entry is mechanistic only
In shortIsolated in the 1970s from rabbit blood during electrically induced sleep, and named after the deep sleep its discoverers associated with it. The name has done a great deal of work ever since. Fifty years later there is still no consistent picture: some studies report effects on sleep, others find none, and no receptor has ever been identified.
DSIP was isolated in the 1970s from the blood of rabbits during electrically induced sleep, and named for the delta-wave sleep its discoverers associated with it. The name has done a great deal of work ever since.
Subsequent decades have not produced a consistent picture. Some studies report effects on sleep architecture, others find none. No receptor has been definitively identified, and the peptide's presence and role as an endogenous signal remain unsettled. It is one of the clearest cases in this catalogue of a compound whose reputation rests substantially on its name.
In shortNo established receptor and no agreed mechanism. Proposals over the years have included effects on the brain's calming signals, on stress hormone release, and antioxidant activity. Fifty years without an identified receptor is itself informative. It does not prove the peptide does nothing, but every proposed mechanism is currently a description of a correlation rather than an explanation.
No established receptor and no agreed mechanism. Proposals over the years have included modulation of GABAergic and opioidergic signalling, effects on corticosteroid release, and antioxidant activity.
The absence of an identified receptor after fifty years is itself informative. It does not prove the peptide is inert, but it does mean every proposed mechanism is currently a description of an observed correlation rather than an explanation.
In shortInconsistent, and old. Small human studies from the 1980s reported changes in sleep measures in some groups, including people with long-term insomnia, while others found nothing. There is no modern, properly sized, well-controlled trial for sleep or anything else. It has been studied on and off for five decades without producing a result that convinced the field.
Mechanistic and inconsistent. Small human studies from the 1980s reported changes in sleep parameters in some populations, including people with chronic insomnia, while others found no effect.
There is no modern, adequately powered, well-controlled trial for sleep or any other indication. The literature is old, small, heterogeneous, and largely from a small number of groups.
The honest summary is that this compound has been studied intermittently for five decades without producing a result that convinced the field.
In shortLimited human exposure in old, small studies reported few problems, but very few people were studied and follow-up was short. Essentially nothing is known about repeated or long-term use. With no identified receptor it is not even possible to reason about what the likely off-target risks would be, which is a worse position than having a known mechanism to worry about.
Limited human exposure in old small studies reported few adverse effects, but the total number of people studied is small and the follow-up short.
Essentially nothing is known about repeated or long-term use. Given no identified receptor, it is not even possible to reason clearly about what the plausible off-target risks would be, which is a worse epistemic position than having a known mechanism to worry about.
In shortNot approved anywhere for anything. Sold as a research chemical.
Not approved anywhere for any indication. Sold as a research chemical.
1 study indexed. Findings and limitations get equal weight, on purpose.
Members area
Everything above is free to read. What an account opens is the evidence underneath it: 1 study with their limitations, and the regimen each trial actually reported.
Free to create. A membership is separate, and you can decide about that later.
Reading is free, an account is not the same as paying. 43 compound guides, every study with its limitations written underneath, and the regimens those trials actually used. A free account opens all of it. A membership is a separate decision, and it opens the forum. What membership costs.
The wider literature
14 indexed papers and 0 registered trials mentioning DSIP, straight from PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. These have not been read by us. Unlike the studies above, they carry no findings and no limitations written by anyone here, because writing either would mean claiming a reading nobody has done. They are a starting point for yours.
Tukhovskaya EA, et al.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021PMID 34500605
journal article
Sukhanova TV, et al.Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications2014PMID 25063142
journal article
Kovalzon VM, et al.Journal of neurochemistry2006PMID 16539679
journal articleresearch support, non-u.s. gov'treview
Stanojlović OP, et al.Seizure2005PMID 15911358
comparative studyjournal articleresearch support, non-u.s. gov't
Pollard BJ, et al.European journal of anaesthesiology2001PMID 11437870
editorialreview
Bjartell A, et al.Peptides1989PMID 2664725
journal articleresearch support, non-u.s. gov't
Ernst A, et al.Journal of neurology1987PMID 2448424
comparative studyjournal article
Sahu A, et al.Life sciences1987PMID 3550343
journal articleresearch support, u.s. gov't, p.h.s.
Graf MV, et al.Peptides1986PMID 3550726
journal articleresearch support, non-u.s. gov'tresearch support, u.s. gov't, non-p.h.s.review
Schoenenberger GAEuropean neurology1984PMID 6548966
comparative studyjournal article
Graf MV, et al.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews1984PMID 6145137
journal articlereview
Banks WA, et al.Life sciences1983PMID 6688848
journal article
Banks WA, et al.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior1982PMID 6897451
journal article
Schoenenberger GA, et al.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1977PMID 265572
journal article
DSIP has its own forum, split by the same six categories as the rest of the site.
The oldest record the importer found for DSIP is from 1977. The newest is 2021. That is 44 y…
Members only. Join to read the rest
Membership
The guide above is open to everyone, and the literature underneath it opens with a free account. That is the educational half of this site. Reading and joining the discussion around DSIP, and every other entry, is what membership pays for.
For Research & Educational Discussion Only. Not Medical Advice
This guide is educational reference material compiled from published literature. It is not medical advice, not a recommendation, and not a substitute for a clinician who knows your history. Nothing here should be used to make a decision about your own health without one.
Talk to a licensed healthcare professional.