AOD-9604: 14 records, and not one trial that gave it to anyone
AOD 9604 is a Growth hormone C terminal fragment, and the guide for it is up. The archive ho…
Members only. Join to read the rest
For Research & Educational Discussion Only. Not Medical Advice
Growth hormone C-terminal fragment
Also known as hGH fragment 176-191, Lipotropin fragment
A growth hormone fragment that completed a phase 2b obesity trial and did not beat placebo. One of the few entries here with a proper negative result.
In shortA fragment of growth hormone, the end section linked to fat breakdown, built on the idea that this part could be separated from the growth and blood sugar effects of the whole hormone. It is here for the same reason ipamorelin is: it was properly tested in a real mid-stage trial, and it failed. That is more information than almost anything else at this end of the ladder offers.
AOD-9604 is a synthetic fragment corresponding to residues 176 to 191 of human growth hormone, the C-terminal region associated with the lipolytic effects of GH. It was developed on the hypothesis that this region could be separated from the growth-promoting and glucose effects of the whole hormone.
It is in this catalogue for the same reason ipamorelin is: it was properly tested, in a real phase 2b, and it failed. That is more information than almost anything else at this end of the ladder offers, and it is almost never mentioned.
In shortThe idea was to trigger fat breakdown and block fat storage, copying growth hormone's effect on fat without acting at the growth hormone receptor, so without raising IGF-1 or affecting blood sugar the same way. Animal work in obese mice supported the concept. What actually produces the effect has never been clearly identified, which is a notable gap for something that got this far.
The proposed mechanism is stimulation of lipolysis and inhibition of lipogenesis in adipose tissue, reproducing the fat-metabolism effects of growth hormone without acting at the GH receptor and therefore without raising IGF-1 or affecting glucose in the same way.
Animal work in obese mice supported the concept. The receptor or pathway responsible for the effect has never been clearly identified, which is a notable gap for a compound that went as far as it did.
In shortEarly human work, and negative where it counted. A mid-stage randomised placebo-controlled trial in obesity showed no significant weight loss against placebo, and the programme was discontinued. Later work looked at injecting it into joints, and it has been pursued as a food ingredient in some markets. The absence of a positive weight result is the central fact.
Early clinical, and negative where it counted. A phase 2b randomised placebo-controlled trial in obesity did not show significant weight reduction versus placebo, and the obesity programme was discontinued.
Later work explored intra-articular use in osteoarthritis and the compound has been pursued as a food ingredient in some markets, which is a very different regulatory conversation from a therapeutic one.
The absence of a positive obesity result is the central fact and should lead any discussion of it.
In shortTrial use was generally well tolerated, with no sign of the blood sugar or IGF-1 effects whole growth hormone causes, which was the point of the design. Good tolerability in a trial where the drug did not work is a weak recommendation. There is no long-term data in healthy adults, and material sold under this name is unverified research-grade.
Trial exposure was generally well tolerated, with no signal of the glucose or IGF-1 effects associated with whole growth hormone, which was the point of the design.
Good tolerability in a trial where the drug did not work is a weak recommendation. Long-term data in healthy adults does not exist, and material sold under this name is unverified research-grade.
In shortNot approved as a medicine anywhere. It has been sold as a cosmetic or food ingredient in some countries under completely different rules, which is frequently misrepresented as approval. Banned in sport.
Not approved as a therapeutic anywhere. Has been marketed as a cosmetic or food ingredient in some jurisdictions under entirely different regulatory frameworks, which is frequently misrepresented as approval. Prohibited in sport under WADA's S2 category.
1 study indexed. Findings and limitations get equal weight, on purpose.
Members area
Everything above is free to read. What an account opens is the evidence underneath it: 1 study with their limitations, and the regimen each trial actually reported.
Free to create. A membership is separate, and you can decide about that later.
Reading is free, an account is not the same as paying. 43 compound guides, every study with its limitations written underneath, and the regimens those trials actually used. A free account opens all of it. A membership is a separate decision, and it opens the forum. What membership costs.
The wider literature
16 indexed papers and 0 registered trials mentioning AOD-9604, straight from PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. These have not been read by us. Unlike the studies above, they carry no findings and no limitations written by anyone here, because writing either would mean claiming a reading nobody has done. They are a starting point for yours.
Rahman OF, et al.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2026PMID 41490200
journal articlereview
Mendias CL, et al.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2026PMID 41966639
journal articlereview
Habibullah MM, et al.Drug design, development and therapy2022PMID 35783198
journal article
Schänzer W, et al.Mass spectrometry reviews2017PMID 26213263
journal articleresearch support, non-u.s. gov'treview
Thomas A, et al.Journal of separation science2016PMID 26578461
evaluation studyjournal articleresearch support, non-u.s. gov't
Kwon DR, et al.Annals of clinical and laboratory science2015PMID 26275694
journal article
Cox HD, et al.Drug testing and analysis2015PMID 25208511
journal articleresearch support, n.i.h., extramuralvalidation study
Thevis M, et al.Expert review of proteomics2014PMID 25382550
journal articleresearch support, non-u.s. gov't
Thevis M, et al.Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis2014PMID 24906629
journal articleresearch support, non-u.s. gov'treview
Orlovius AK, et al.Drug testing and analysis2013PMID 24124033
letterresearch support, non-u.s. gov't
Halford JCCurrent opinion in investigational drugs (London, England : 2000)2006PMID 16625817
journal articlereview
Bayés M, et al.Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology2005PMID 15834452
bibliographyjournal article
Wilding JCurrent opinion in investigational drugs (London, England : 2000)2004PMID 15134286
journal articlereview
Bayés M, et al.Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology2003PMID 14571286
bibliographyjournal article
Bayes M, et al.Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology2003PMID 14685303
bibliographyjournal article
Natori S, et al.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1996PMID 8633084
comparative studyjournal articleresearch support, non-u.s. gov't
AOD-9604 has its own forum, split by the same six categories as the rest of the site.
AOD 9604 is a Growth hormone C terminal fragment, and the guide for it is up. The archive ho…
Members only. Join to read the rest
Membership
The guide above is open to everyone, and the literature underneath it opens with a free account. That is the educational half of this site. Reading and joining the discussion around AOD-9604, and every other entry, is what membership pays for.
For Research & Educational Discussion Only. Not Medical Advice
This guide is educational reference material compiled from published literature. It is not medical advice, not a recommendation, and not a substitute for a clinician who knows your history. Nothing here should be used to make a decision about your own health without one.
Talk to a licensed healthcare professional.